top of page
  • Writer's pictureAfriHKa

Messi Mess: Tatler Asia Faces Backlash, Prompts Partial Ticket Reimbursements



Embattled Tatler Asia is currently under fire after Argentine football superstar Lionel Messi failed to make an appearance at the highly anticipated exhibition match between the Hong Kong Team and Inter Miami CF. As a result, disgruntled fans have been demanding refunds, and sources suggest that Tatler Asia may announce partial ticket reimbursements today.

The exhibition match, held last Sunday, promised to showcase Messi's football prowess. However, much to the disappointment of the crowd, Messi remained seated on the bench and did not participate in the game, leading to a chorus of boos. Adding to the frustration, Messi only played for 30 minutes in a subsequent match against Vissel Kobe in Japan, fueling speculation about potential political factors influencing his limited participation.


Over a thousand fans have lodged complaints with the Consumer Council, urging the Hong Kong organizers to issue refunds. In response, Tatler Asia is reportedly considering returning some ticket funds to appease the aggrieved fans.


Despite the backlash, Tatler Asia's social media presence remains composed, with recent Lunar New Year greetings. However, the brand's image has been tarnished by its practice of deleting negative comments and refund demands from its social feeds. While Tatler Hong Kong, a sister account, has remained silent since its last formal statement, the main account continues to engage with the public in a mocking tone, intensifying the negative sentiment.


The controversy surrounding Tatler Asia is not only significant in terms of customer dissatisfaction but also financially. As of yesterday, the Consumer Council has received 1,178 complaints related to the match, amounting to HK$8,143,945 ($1,046,000) in financial implications. The average claim is around HK$6,913 ($887), with a single claim reaching as high as HK$82,960 ($10,643).



The situation has escalated to the legislative level, with Legislative Councillor Bill Tang demanding action outside the Small Claims Tribunal. Tang has accused Tatler Asia of potential violations of the "Trade Descriptions Ordinance" and has given the company a one-week ultimatum to provide refunds or face legal consequences.


The controversy has not only affected Tatler Asia's relationship with its audience but could also have ramifications for its relationships with advertisers. Industry insiders suggest that the company's reluctance to issue refunds is being closely observed by the advertising community. Brands may reconsider their association with Tatler Asia, as public perception plays a crucial role in the advertising industry.


Marketing experts warn that the longer Tatler Asia resists public and governmental pressure to address the issue, the more severe the long-term effects will be. Advertisers may turn to publications with a strong readership and a reputation for integrity and consumer respect. In the luxury marketing sector, where image is paramount, any association with a controversial publication could harm brands' reputations. The potential withdrawal of advertisers could lead to a challenging financial future for Tatler Asia, underscoring the need for a swift and transparent resolution to the crisis.


The unfolding drama surrounding Tatler Asia's handling of the Messi no-show continues to captivate both consumers and the media. All eyes are now on Tatler Asia as the public awaits the company's next move.


梅西混亂:《Tatler Asia》面臨強烈抵制,要求償還部分門票



受困境中的Tatler Asia在阿根廷足球巨星梅西未能出場的備受期待的展示賽事中引起了爭議。因此,不滿的球迷一直要求退款,消息人士稱Tatler Asia可能在今天宣布部分退票。


上星期舉行的展示賽事承諾展示梅西的足球技藝。然而,令人失望的是,梅西只是坐在板凳上,沒有參與比賽,引起觀眾一片噓聲。更加加劇球迷的失望的是,梅西在隨後對陣日本神戶勝利船的比賽中只打了30分鐘,引起有關潛在政治因素的猜測。


超過一千名球迷向消費者委員會投訴,要求香港的主辦方退款。作為回應,Tatler Asia據稱正在考慮退還部分票款以安撫受害的球迷。


儘管受到批評,Tatler Asia的社交媒體形象保持鎮定,最近還發布了農曆新年的祝福。然而,該品牌的形象因其在社交媒體上刪除負面評論和退款要求的做法而受到損害。與最後一份正式聲明相比,Tatler Asia的姐妹帳戶Tatler Hong Kong保持了明顯的沉默,而主要帳戶則以嘲諷的口吻與公眾互動,加劇了負面情緒。


有關Tatler Asia的爭議不僅在客戶不滿方面具有重要意義,而且在財務上也具有重要意義。截至昨天,消費者委員會已收到與比賽有關的1,178宗投訴,金額總計為HK$8,143,945(約1,046,000美元),平均每宗案件為HK$6,913(約887美元),單宗最高索賠金額達到HK$82,960(約10,643美元)。


此事已升級至立法層面,立法會議員鄧維剛要求在小額訴訟庭之外采取行動。鄧維剛指責Tatler Asia可能違反了《商品說明條例》,並給予該公司一個一周的最後期限,要求其提供退款,否則將面臨法律後果。


該爭議不僅影響了Tatler Asia與觀眾的關係,還可能影響其與廣告商的合作。業內人士表示,該公司不願意退款的態度正在被廣告界所關注。品牌可能會重新考慮與Tatler Asia的合作,因為公眾觀感在廣告行業中起著至關重要的作用。


市場營銷專家警告稱,Tatler Asia越是抵制擺脫公眾和政府壓力,解決問題的時間越長,長期影響就會越嚴重。廣告商可能會轉向讀者眾多、具有誠信和尊重消費者的出版物。在形象至上的奢侈品行銷行業中,與具有爭議的出版物有關聯可能會損害品牌的聲譽。廣告商的撤離可能導致Tatler Asia面臨艱難的財務前景,凸顯了迅速和透明地解決危機的必要性。


Tatler Asia處理梅西未出席事件的方式所引發的戲劇仍然吸引著消費者和媒體的關注。現在所有人都在關注Tatler Asia的下一步行動。

Comments


bottom of page